Feature & Improvement Requests

Summary As a sustainability manager at a large corporation, I am responsible for tracking and reducing our company's emissions. One of the challenges I face is accurately assigning emissions from our level 2 emission groups to our level 3 product carbon footprints. I want to be able to use established allocation rules and data from our level 2 emission groups to distribute emissions to our level 3 products in a consistent and transparent manner. I want to be able to easily set up and manage the allocation rules that will be used, as well as collect and organize the necessary data. I also want to be able to apply the allocation rules and review the resulting emissions data to ensure its accuracy and consistency. By using this functionality, I can improve the accuracy of our emissions data and better understand the environmental impact of our products. This will enable me to develop more effective strategies for reducing our emissions and achieving our sustainability goals. Some examples how to do To use level 2 data (emission groups) to allocate emissions to level 3 product carbon footprints, the following steps could be taken: Determine the allocation rules that will be used to distribute emissions from the level 2 emission groups to the level 3 product carbon footprints. This could involve using a simple allocation method, such as a uniform distribution, or a more complex method that takes into account factors such as product sales or production volume. Collect the necessary data, such as emissions data for the level 2 emission groups and product-related data for the level 3 product carbon footprints. Use the allocation rules to distribute the emissions from the level 2 emission groups to the level 3 product carbon footprints. This could involve applying the rules to the data to calculate the emissions for each product. Review and validate the allocated emissions to ensure that they are accurate and consistent with the allocation rules. This could involve checking for any inconsistencies or errors and making any necessary adjustments. Use the allocated emissions to report on the environmental impact of the organization's products. This could involve presenting the data in a clear and concise manner, such as in a table or graph, to facilitate analysis and decision-making. The strengths of using level 2 data to allocate emissions to level 3 product carbon footprints include the ability to use established allocation rules and the availability of data for the level 2 emission groups. The limitations of this approach include the potential for allocation errors or inconsistencies and the inability to account for certain factors that may affect a product's emissions, such as the use of renewable energy or offsets.

A system for evaluating the reliability of this data. This could involve comparing the data from each supplier to other sources, such as industry standards or other suppliers' data, and assigning a rating or score based on how closely it matches. This rating could be shown in a variety of ways, such as a simple score or rating out of 100, a percentage of data points that were found to be accurate, or a comparison to other suppliers' data accuracy. For example, you might see a message like "Supplier A's data accuracy is 94%, which is higher than the average for your industry" or "Supplier B has 100% accurate data for the past 12 months." This information can help you understand the quality of the data provided by your suppliers and take action to improve it if necessary.

As a sustainability manager, you want to have an overview of the emissions libraries that ClimateCamp offers and uses in its platform. This will allow you to better understand the types of emissions data that are available and how they can be used. You can use this information to make more informed decisions about how to track and manage emissions in your organization. For example, you might want to see which emissions libraries are most commonly used by other organizations, or you might want to explore new emissions libraries that could help you better understand your own organization's emissions. By having an overview of the emissions libraries that ClimateCamp offers, you can make more informed decisions about how to track and manage emissions in your organization.

As a sustainability manager, i want to have a clear history of all my emissions factors that have been used over the time for a specific category. Examples: I want to see when i rejected a specific emission factor i received from a supplier I want to see when i approved a specific emission factor. I want to see when i added my own custom emission factor.

As a sustainability manager, i want to set all my activity data as "reviewed" once i know that my final activities are correctly set in the system. As a sustainability manager, you want to be able to keep track of which activity data has been reviewed and which data is still outstanding or pending. One way you could do this is by using a "tag" system to mark data that has been reviewed, allowing you to easily identify which data still needs to be reviewed. For example, you could create a "reviewed" tag and apply it to any activity data that has been reviewed. This way, you can quickly and easily see which data still needs to be reviewed by looking for items that do not have the "reviewed" tag.

As a sustainability manager, i want to enter my transport (from, to, km) and the quantity, and have my emissions automatically calculated based on that.